Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-08 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-08 Senate Journal Page 1736 HB 90 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; and providing for an effective date" was read the third time. Senator Kelly moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Kelly offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 5, following line 26: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 3. AS 14.11.100(o) is amended to read: (o) The total amount of school construction projects approved for reimbursement by the department under (a)(10) of this section (1) may not exceed $180,064,912 [$151,019,000]; and (2) after June 30, 1998, and until July 1, 2004, shall be allocated as follows: (A) $77,897,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of 25,000 or more students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (B) $14,571,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 15,000 but less than 25,000 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (C) $14,143,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 10,000 but less than 15,000 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (D) $7,429,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 7,500 but less than 10,000 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (E) $20,712,912 [$7,717,000] to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 5,000 but less 2001-05-08 Senate Journal Page 1737 than 7,500 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (F) $2,660,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 2,750 but less than 3,000 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (G) $454,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 2,400 but less than 2,750 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (H) $36,290,000 [$22,790,000] to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 2,050 but less than 2,400 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (I) $329,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 1,700 but less than 1,750 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (J) $286,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 650 but less than 725 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (K) $519,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 500 but less than 525 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (L) $2,224,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 425 but less than 482 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500; (M) $2,550,000 to projects in a municipality with a public school enrollment of at least 350 but less than 373 students in fiscal year 2000, as determined under AS 14.17.500." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Senator Kelly moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Phillips objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-05-08 Senate Journal Page 1738 CSHB 90(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Phillips and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 90(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 19 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Phillips and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S passed the Senate. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Kelly moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in passing CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S. Without objection, it was so ordered. 2001-05-08 Senate Journal Page 1739 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; and providing for an effective date" was automatically before the Senate in third reading. Senator Kelly moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 2. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Kelly offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 2, line 22: Delete "350" Insert "290" Page 2, line 22: Delete "373" Insert "305" Senator Kelly moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 90(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Taylor, Therriault, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Phillips and so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S was automatically in third reading. 2001-05-08 Senate Journal Page 1740 The question being, "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S "An Act relating to reimbursement of municipal bonds for school construction; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 90(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 18 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Cowdery, Davis, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Olson, Pearce, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Phillips, Therriault and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 90(FIN) am S passed the Senate. Senator Leman moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.